A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, at the request of a work partner C, had the intention to arbitrarily obtain and use a credit card registered in C’s name in the process of opening a mobile phone under C’s name, such as the resident registration number, etc.

On January 7, 2011, the Defendant, at the E office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 402, accessed the new card website using a computer, and then entered C personal information, such as the name, resident registration number (F), telephone number, address, etc., on the card application screen, and entered them on the card application website on the 10th day of the same month, and entered the credit card application file in the name of C by accessing the card website, and the new card website around the 17th day of the same month, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising rights and duties, has forged a credit card application file of C, which is an electronic record of others.

2. The Defendant sent a credit card application file, as mentioned in paragraph (1), at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), via the Internet as if he/she was duly formed to the staff in charge of the cards, and as if he/she was duly formed, at the same time and place.

3. Fraud;

A. On January 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) deceivings a victim by transmitting a victim’s new card or a lot card file to a staff member in charge of a credit card; and (b) let a staff member in charge of a credit card issue a C credit card under the name of E office to receive two new cards (G, H), and one lot card (I) from E office, respectively.

B. On January 13, 201, the Defendant issued an order to pay the price for goods at the center of the trade name “J” near the U.S. Geum-si Station, and then presented the said card in the name of C, which was issued unlawfully, to the employee as if he was the Defendant card.