A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 20, 2020, at around 18:05, the Defendant interfered with his duties and caused property damage: (a) by drinking in the commercial corridor in front of the “D” office operated by the victim B, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) opened the said office, without any reason, to ask the victim “Iekh”; (c) opened the victim’s bet the victim in the said office; and (d) laid the victim’s bet the chair in the said office; and (d) opened the victim’s kid, the victim’s bat; (c) batd the victim’s bat with the victim’s hand; and (d) batd the victim’s bat, the part of the victim’s batfing right part adjacent to the Defendant’s seat right part on the market price and the part of the right part on the market price left in the market price.

Since then, the defendant returned to the office, and carried out a plaque as above within the above office by around 15 minutes from the 18:20th day of the same day, such as the defendant spawn the book and the chair, and spawning the floor of the office.

Accordingly, the defendant, by force, interfered with the business of the victim's credit service office and damaged the victim's property.

2. On January 20, 2020, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) around 18:25, when G, who was a police official (police officer) belonging to the Seoul Young Military Police Station F District, who was called up after receiving a report of 112, to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender suspected of interfering with his duties and causing property damage; (b) the said G’s static and upper parts of the body are walking back several times; (c) the Defendant was able to wear the police gate on his/her hand, who was worn by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. A written statement prepared B;

1. The date and time of the commission of an investigation report, a DNA campaign video confirmation, and the hearing of victimized police officials’ G oral statements;