A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 31, 2004, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in Daegu District Court racing support, on December 1, 2008, a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On July 13, 2009, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On April 11, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 22, 2014, at around 00:56, the Defendant: (a) driven Cho-do under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.172% without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 3km from the border school near the Gyeong-dong in Dongcheon-si to the entrance road of the first apartment at the time of the race-si, the Defendant driven Cho-do under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.172%.

2. At around 01:10 on June 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report at the entrance of the above treatment 1 apartment, and received a request for a alcohol measurement from an assistant E belonging to the said Do box; and (b) received a notification from the said E to arrest him as a flagrant offender, such as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, while refusing to comply with the request, the Defendant committed assault, such as assaulting the said E’s e-throps by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in flagrant crimes.

3. After the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the time and place specified in paragraph (2) of the above Article, the Defendant got on the F patrol vehicle and moved to a D police box, the Defendant broken down the glass window to the left-hand side of the patrol vehicle twice for the amount of KRW 70,000.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged patrol cars, which are goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police of E.