logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2020.05.28 2019고단757
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 28, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court racing support.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a radar car;

On September 27, 2019, at around 16:00, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol with 0.033% of alcohol concentration, and led to turn to the left at the seat of C Hospital from the efficacy-dong.

There are three-lanes of roads and two-lanes of roads, where signals, etc. are installed, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in violation of the signal, and received the part of the victim D (the victim D, the 41-year old-pured passenger vehicle’s top top-down part prior to the Defendant’s driver’s operation of the car in front of the car in front of the Defendant’s operation.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks due to such occupational negligence.

2. Around 16:00 on September 27, 2019, the Defendant driven a radar car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.03% from the section of approximately 7km from the front day of the Sim-si to the front day of the Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-dong, Chungcheongnam-si.

As a result, the defendant was a person with the power of violating the Road Traffic Act prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol again, and driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above prohibition provision.

3. A defendant who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

arrow