The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the grounds for appeal of this case, the Defendant’s recognition of the crime of this case is against the Defendant, and the fact that it appears that the Defendant’s illegal game room’s size is not large and that the Defendant’s profit did not exist is considered in favor of the Defendant.

However, even though the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. on April 5, 2011 (the crime of this case was committed by the defendant again during the period of suspension of execution due to the same crime) and was sentenced to imprisonment for ten months (the crime of this case was committed by the defendant again during the period of suspension of execution due to the same crime), the defendant's age, family relation, criminal conduct, circumstances of crime and circumstances after imprisonment with prison labor cannot be considered to be unfair by taking into account the records of the crime of this case as follows: (a) it is not good in light of the criminal law; (b) it is found that the crime of this case was committed by the defendant with the knowledge of the fact that the illegal game site was regulated, and was arrested after being appointed and arrested; (c) it is very serious that the crime related to the illegal game place of this case is likely to cause harm to the general public to work in an excessive spirit of gambling; and (d) it is necessary to punish the defendant's age, character and behavior, circumstances, and circumstances after imprisonment.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.