The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each sentence imposed by the court below on the Defendants (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of probation and community service order, 240 hours of probation and community service order, six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation and community service order, 120 hours of probation and community service order) is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The judgment of Defendant A operated an illegal game room over two occasions from November 6, 2012 to November 8, 2012; from November 7, 2013 to November 10, 2013; Defendant B is not good to actively participate in the crime, such as working as a head-class employee in the illegal game room at the time of committing the crime in 2012; Defendants escape from the illegal game room in 2012; Defendants escape and escape from the crime in 2012; Defendants were 65 times in the case of the crime in 2012, and 60 times in the case of the crime in 2013, and the number of times in the case of the crime in 2013, and Defendant A operated the same kind of crime before and after the suspension of execution; Defendants A and B did not have to be subject to punishment for the same kind of crime; Defendant B had been employed by each of the following employees; Defendant B had no sufficient means to punish the same kind of crime; Defendant A’s motive and more than 13 of punishment.

3. The conclusion is as to the Defendants.