The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, two years of probation, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. Circumstances favorable to the defendant are as follows.

The Defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected in the instant case.

The defendant has father of the third degree with physical disability in need of support.

The defendant is not healthy due to extracting salt.

The defendant is not only the managing director of the illegal game room, but also the operator.

Circumstances unfavorable to the defendant are as follows:

In March of 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a fine for the violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and the same criminal record, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment, due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. around August 2008.

The Defendant introduced other employees to the illegal game site of this case.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, career, environment, background and result of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.