beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant began to teach the Defendant from around December 2013 with the Victim B (Inn, 41 years of age) and from around December 2013, and was in a de facto marital relationship from around that time by raising marriage on June 21, 2014.
While preparing for marriage with the victim, the defendant found his house to live together with the victim, and the victim acquired the deposit money from the victim under the pretext of concluding the lease contract for the above apartment with the mind of the apartment located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 208 Dong 905, by acquiring the deposit money from the victim, and forged the lease contract for the above apartment, thereby exercising it against the victim.
1. Fraud;
A. A. Around December 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the Empo-gu Empo-dong, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; (b) on the part of the Defendant, the Empo-si; (c) “F Company entering the Republic of Korea owns an apartment complex with the deposit of KRW 430 million in Seongdong-gu, Seoul; and (d) the deposit of KRW 905,000,000. At present, F Company’s annual salary received from the company is KRW 80,000,000; and (d) collected KRW 200,000,000,000 within the deposit of the company’s life. At present, the first contract was concluded until August 2015, 2015, the amount of the deposit of KRW 180,000,0000,000,0000,0000,0000,000 won was to be refunded.”
However, the fact is that F Co., Ltd., in which the Defendant was working, did not own G apartment, and even if the Defendant was working in the above company, G apartment could not be provided, G apartment was not contracted, G apartment was not paid, and the property which was collected without the benefits paid periodically at the time was merely 16 million won, and there was no money from the victim because of the fact that he did not live in G apartment, and therefore there was no money from the victim.