logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.13 2017고단7126
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with the name and unclaimed winners, who were the cause of the telephone finance fraud organization located in China, etc., operated the call center as if they were to give a large number of unspecified victims a loan at low interest, and made the victims transfer money to the account under the name of the head of the Tong, which is called “the head of the Tong” under the name of the repayment of the loan, etc., and the Defendant, when the said “head of the Tong” withdraws the money received from the victims, the Defendant served as the so-called “delivery book” that serves as the part of the victims, and received 10 to 200,000 won per day.

The defendant was ordered by the above person in the name of the defendant to delete the contents of the telegram, and there is no need to communicate with the other party who raised the money, and when receiving the money, the defendant did not confirm the legitimacy of the contents of the order, even though the contents of the order are not normal business instructions, such as receiving orders from the defendant to use a taxi or guide, which is not a vehicle of the defendant. The defendant did not confirm the identity of the person in the name of the above and the business address at all. The defendant did not confirm the identity of the person in the name of the above. The defendant did not act as a book for soliciting the singing passbook prior to the participation in the crime, but he knew that the proposal of the person in the name of the above can be a tort, such as singing, etc., even though he knew that the above proposal of the person in the name of the defendant

On March 22, 2017, the above bearers call the victim E to change the existing high interest loan to the low interest rate loan.

If so, part of the existing loan must be repaid.

“Falsely speaking,” each of them was remitted to the new bank account (G) in the name of “the head State,” in the name of F, as the repayment of existing loans from the injured party, KRW 20 million around 15:52 on March 22, 2017, and KRW 12:50 on March 23, 2017.

arrow