logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.02.05 2015고단1942
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by a fine of 2 million won.

Defendant

B and C, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On November 8, 2012, A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than one year and six months for causing injury or injury to the execution of special duties by the Cheongju District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on January 31, 2014.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime (violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts) is the actual business owner who actually operated a massage place in the trade name, “F,” from the third floor of the building located in the Cheongju-si E, and the Defendants B (participation from September 18, 2015 to November 1, 2015) and C (participation from October 8, 2015 to November 1, 2015) are employees who provided the said massage place with a customer’s guidance, cleaning, and heart.

Defendant

A, along with Defendant B and Defendant C, opened a commercial sex acts centering on the trade name “F” around September 18, 2015. From around that time to around November 1, 2015, A used a commercial sex acts with the name of “G and H” to employ a female sexual sex acts with the nationality of “G and H” at the above business establishment, and had them find out the place, receive 120,000 won in return for the commercial sex acts and arrange for the commercial sex acts.

2. Defendant A

A. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant violated the Medical Service Act was unable to establish a massage place, the Defendant established a massage place with the trade name of “F” around August 2015, and employed the 5-state female under the name of “I, J, K, L, and M as an employee who is not qualified as a massage club.” From around that time to around November 2, 2015, the Defendant allowed an unspecified customer who found the said place of business to perform the massage operation in such a way as to devise or devise the part of the bucks, bucks, and so on.

As a result, the Defendant established a massage place even though he was not a massage doctor.

B. The Defendant in violation of the Immigration Control Act is prohibited from employing a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea, but establishes a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “F” around September 18, 2015.

arrow