logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.05.03 2016고단372
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants [Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging Sexual Traffic (Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts)] Defendant A is an actual business owner operating a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "D," located on the fourth floor of the building C of the Cheongju-si, Seoul, and Defendant B (participation from October 10, 2015 to April 14 of the same month) is an employee who provided guidance to customers, cleaning, and emotional distress, etc. at the said commercial sex business establishment.

From December 1, 2015 to the 14th day of the same month, the Defendants employed female sex trafficking with their own nationality in the name of E, F, G, H, and I at the above sexual traffic business establishment, and had three male customers who found their place of sexual traffic receive approximately KRW 1,30,000 in return for sexual intercourse from around three male customers (average three male customers per day) and arranged sexual intercourse.

2. Defendant A

A. The Defendant violated the Medical Service Act, even though he/she was unable to establish a massage place, the Defendant established a massage place with the above “D” around December 1, 2015, and employed female nationals of the birth state in the name of J, K, and L who are not qualified as a massageman as a massage employee from around that time to around December 14, 2015, and had the said place of business conduct the massage treatment in such a way that he/she saws (three average persons per day) of customers who found the said place of business (three persons per day) by stimulatinging or suppressing the flading the boom, etc.

B. The Defendant violated the Immigration Control Act, despite the fact that he was prohibited from employing a person who does not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking in the Republic of Korea, established a commercial sex business establishment and a massage place with the trade name of the above D around December 1, 2015, and employed the f, G, H, I, J, K, and L under the name of E, G, H, I, K, and L, who did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking in the Republic of Korea from that time to the 14th day of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Police against Defendant B.

arrow