logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.06.26 2014고단1299
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year, Defendant B, C, and E are punished by a fine of two million won, Defendant D, and F, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who sells agricultural materials, installs plastic houses, etc. under the trade name of “K,” registered as a business operator in the name of the Defendant’s wifeJ from Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do.

In order to raise profits from the sale of agricultural materials, the Defendant issued data necessary for applying for subsidies to farmers selected as those eligible for subsidies for subsidized projects implemented by the Hongcheon-gun of Gangwon-do and the Incheon-gun, such as a false statement of transactions in softening the prices of materials, and returned limited amounts equivalent to 13% of the difference between the subsidies and self-charges provided to farmers and the prices of the materials softened to farmers, thereby having them return to farmers the remaining money equivalent to 13% of the difference between the subsidies and self-charges provided to them and the prices of the materials softened, and let farmers not bear the same amount

On the other hand, the victims Hongcheon-gun supported the farmers eligible for support with the amount of KRW 3,00,000 (the amount of KRW 300,000,000 for the national expenses, KRW 2,700,000 for the military expenses) out of KRW 6,000 for the business site of 10 arche (1,000 square meters) and the rest of KRW 3,00,000 for the purpose of promoting the L business (new packaging) in 2012.

On March 2012, the Defendant agreed to supply materials necessary for the installation of a water network with the representative of the NN Complex (8 farms, 35 Dongs) in Hongcheon-gun M, Gangwon-do (8 farms, 35 Dongs) selected as the end of the end of the subsidized project, and solicited B to return to B the remaining money equivalent to 13% of the difference between the material cost actually supplied to eight households, such as B, and the material cost sofed.

Accordingly, around April 2012, the Defendant issued to B a statement of trading that the Defendant supplied materials equivalent to KRW 65,536,625 to B, and B around April 25, 2012, at the Hongcheon-gun Agricultural Technology Center office located in Hongcheon-ro, Hongcheon-do, Hongcheon-do, Hongcheon-do, Hongcheon-ro, Gangwon-do, and at the office of Hongcheon-gun Agricultural Technology Center, the above statement of trading that the public official in charge received from the Defendant.

arrow