Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

At the time of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, the Defendant was driving a vehicle in the opposite direction with the victim, not shocking the victim's elbow with the left side of the vehicle, but rather caused the victim to blue the bluor by hand, so there is no fact that the victim suffered any injury necessary for the relief measures.

The sentencing of the court below's decision on unfair sentencing (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The judgment of the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts is consistent with the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① from the police to the court of the court below, the victim stated that “at the time Defendant’s vehicle was fluort with the left part of the motor vehicle without shocking and stopping the part of the motor vehicle’s left part of the motor vehicle with the left part of the motor vehicle,” ② the diagnosis letter and the court of the first instance, each fact inquiry into F Hospital of the court below, the victim received medical treatment after the diagnosis of the left part of the hospital immediately after the instant case. The victim’s injury part and degree corresponded to the victim’s statement, ③ it is difficult for the victim to recognize that there was any shock between the Defendant and the victim, and even if the victim could have been fluort with the motor vehicle, the victim could easily change the victim’s age, considering the following circumstances.