Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are employees working together in Ulsan-gun C, Ulsan-gun C.

1. At around 21:00 on October 7, 2014, Defendant A, on the street in front of the Ulsan-gun E, Ulsan-gun, U.S., and the seven employees of the workplace, including B, under the influence of alcohol, were challenged with each other, and at the same time reported and sent, Defendant A assaulted by the police officer to interfere with the issue of the Defendant’s daily movement in order for the police officer to remove the Defendant’s daily activities from one another in order to grasp the factual relations between the assistant H of the G police box and the head of the police station affiliated with the same rank I, such as the G police box affiliated with the G police box, and the police officer, who called “I will interfere with the performance of official duties by doing so, but will interfere with the performance of duties by doing so.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the duty of reporting 112.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as above, she saw that there was a defect that Defendant B attempted to spawn the border with one another, and she spawned the police officers with a view to “spawn, spawn, spawn,” and she obstructed the chest and part of the spawn I’s chest and part of the spawn by hand, and obstructed the police officers from opening the spawn in order to prevent the spawn from opening the spawn, and she assaulted the chest H’s chest part by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the duty of reporting 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police protocol to H and I;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders, establishes a state’s legal order and order.