logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.24 2018누71528
업무정지처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as admitting the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, includes “related Acts and subordinate statutes” of the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification as set forth in the following 2, but “3. Conclusion” is the same as the excluded part, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

2. In the case of the modified 11th 9th 9 test results, the phrase “as a result of the two-time test” is added to “as a result of the test from the Defendant, or as a result of the test from the body corresponding to the body under the relevant laws and regulations.”

11 below the 6th day of the revocation of certification shall be added to "the highest disciplinary measure against the relevant violations under the Enforcement Rules of the Environment-Friendly Agriculture and Fisheries Act".

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim should be accepted on the ground of the reasons.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow