1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on July 29, 201 with the short-term commercial status (C-2) sojourn status on July 29, 2011, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on August 8, 2011.

B. The Defendant, on April 1, 2013, promulgated with sufficient grounds for gambling [the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; the same applies hereinafter] to the Plaintiff.

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on May 27, 2013, but the said objection was dismissed on April 11, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including a serial number) and the purport of the entire arguments and arguments. Whether the disposition of this case is legitimate or not, the plaintiff left the Republic of Korea after his entry into the Republic of Korea, and made a phone call to the plaintiff's father for five times, and made intimidation.

As Pakistan is unstable in public order, it is highly likely that a threat to life and body may be posed to the plaintiff's return to Korea.

Therefore, the instant disposition taken on a different premise is unlawful, since the Plaintiff’s return to Pakistan is likely to be detrimental to persecution.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

1) In full view of the requirements for refugee status and the burden of proof, Articles 2 subparag. 3 and 76-2(1) of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; Article 1 of the Refugee Convention; and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol, the Minister of Justice shall either engage in race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.