logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.07.11 2014구합519
난민불인정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On July 26, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term official (Status C-2) visa on July 26, 201, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on August 18, 201.

The Defendant, on January 3, 2013, “a well-founded fear” (amended by the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply) to the Plaintiff on January 3, 2013

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 21, 2013, but the said objection was dismissed on December 23, 2013.

[Grounds for recognition] 1-1, 2-1, 1-1, 2-1, and 1-1, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and whether the disposition of this case is legitimate, the Plaintiff asserted that the disposition of this case is legitimate, together with his family members, were residing in the Haaka (Khera), and the Plaintiff was drafted into the Plaintiff’s form B on June 6, 2010 by force with his family members.

On June 11, 2010, the plaintiff's punishment after the escape of the next day, she found the plaintiff's house again and killed the plaintiff's punishment and her father.

The plaintiff, together with the remaining family members, has been living in other areas of Apistan, continued to be threatened by Apistan, and entered the affected Republic of Korea.

As can be seen, even if the Plaintiff is sufficiently anticipated to be harmed in the event of repatriation to Apistan, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, and thus, the instant disposition is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

In addition to the respective statements in subparagraphs 3 through 6 of this paragraph, the following facts or circumstances are recognized.

The plaintiff was killed by his father and his punishment and threatened with the sloping team.

arrow