1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 4, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term commercial visa (C-2) on a short-term date (C-2) August 23, 201, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on August 23, 2011.

B. On January 23, 2013, the Defendant rendered a disposition denying the recognition of refugee status on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case of “a sufficiently-founded fear of persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. On February 21, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 21, 2013, but was dismissed on December 23, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is extremely uneasy state of security, such as the frequent occurrence of terrorism by the Lestan.

The father of the plaintiff thought that the father was a member of the posture, and that the posture was wrong, began to work for the government of the Apististan.

A Leban returned to the father of the plaintiff, but the father of the plaintiff refused to do so, and the father of the plaintiff died on March 5, 2009.

He killed the Plaintiff’s father on August 20, 2009, but he was found to work together with the Plaintiff on August 20, 2009, but he refused by the Plaintiff and detained the Plaintiff.

In the event that the plaintiff had come to know of escape and return to the house, the lelebbs came to know that the lebs have captured the plaintiff's remaining vegetable life.

On September 4, 2009, the plaintiff reported to the police on September 4, 2009, and the police and the police were punished for a total attack, and the plaintiff's remaining birth was killed in the process.

Since then, while the plaintiff left a car, the plaintiff still remains the plaintiff.

Therefore, the Plaintiff.