beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 14,285,714 for each of the Plaintiffs and 20% per annum from October 25, 2014 to September 30, 2015; and (b) for each of the Plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The network D died on November 2, 2012.
B. The Plaintiff A is the father of the network D, the father of the Plaintiff B, the mother of the network D, and the Defendant’s spouse who completed the marriage report on October 24, 201 with the network D and the network D.
There is no child to the network D.
At the time of the death of the insurance company, the insurance company's argument between the plaintiffs and the defendant was raised on the premise that the beneficiary is the heir at the time of the death of the heir of the personal automobile insurance 50,000,000.
2ING life insurance) LING life insurance 28,316,644 inheritors 3 ING life insurance) LAFCI life insurance 200,000,000 plaintiffs claimed that this part of the insurance money is KRW 200,000,000.
This part of the insurance money is not clear whether it is KRW 200,000,000, or not. However, it appears to be the nearest amount, and as seen below, there is no dispute between the plaintiffs and the defendant that the insurance money was paid in whole, and therefore, it is stated as KRW 200,000.
The inheritor’s heir 10,767,30 won and heir 10,767,300 won and heir 60,000,000,000,000 status of Samsung PPPP 10,000,000
C. As an insurance contract with the network D as the insured and with the network D’s death as an insured event, the content of the insurance contract for which the insurance money is paid upon the network D’s death is as follows:
Insurance money of Nos. 2 and 3 of the above table (ING life insurance) and insurance money of Nos. 4 of the above table (US) were paid by the plaintiffs and the defendant as insurance money corresponding to their respective statutory shares in inheritance.
The plaintiffs excluded this part of the insurance money from the claim while they were paid the insurance money.
The details of payment are as follows.
ING life insurance (totaling No. 2 and No. 3): Plaintiff A received KRW 63,66,363 on February 21, 2013 from E’s account, Plaintiff B received KRW 63,66,363 on January 31, 2013, and Defendant received KRW 95,49,544 on February 21, 2013.