logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2021.02.02 2020고단4374
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The so-called "scaming" criminal organization is composed of the organization that defrauds an unspecified number of people by deceiving a financial institution, etc. by deceiving the victim and deceiving it. It consists of so-called total liability and management measures that plans and instructs the crime by directly receiving money from the victims or by transfer of money to the account, inducing the victims to deliver money by telephone, remittance of money from the victims, such as the transfer of money, and collection or withdrawal of money from the victims, and it consists of the organization that uses smartphone scam, etc. that can avoid the tracking of investigation agency.

On September 19, 2020, the Defendant conspiredd to participate in the phishing crime by taking charge of cash collection, such as receiving proposals from an employee to engage in telephone financing fraud.

1. On September 21, 2020, when misrepresenting the victim C by telephoneing the victim C at an irregular land on September 21, 2020, “The Government Support Fund has been provided at low interest, and the existing E loans should be repaid in full.

The amount of direct repayment shall be delivered to the E-debt Collection Team staff.

The phrase “G” was false and had the victim withdraw 38.5 million won, and then had the victim go in the future of “G” located in “G” in the Pakistan.

On September 23, 2020, the Defendant sent the victim to the victim at around 14:10 on September 23, 2020, and “The head of HO team has been sent to the victim.”

The facts, such as “,” are that the Defendant, even though he is not an employee of a financial institution, re-influences the victim as if he was an employee of the financial institution, and was issued 38.5 million won in cash from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to name.

arrow