logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.07.17 2020구합53729
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. On January 8, 2020, the Defendant filed a claim for revocation of dismissal disposition C between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of decision on the petition examination;

A. The Plaintiff is a school juristic person that establishes and operates D Middle Schools and D High Schools.

An intervenor was newly appointed to D High Schools on March 1, 1996, and was transferred to D Middle Schools on March 1, 2010.

Descriptions of Disciplinary Grounds

I. Violation of the duty to maintain dignity under Article 63 of the State Public Officials Act

1. The defamation intervenor due to the statement of false facts and dissemination shall damage the reputation of the Plaintiff and the D secondary high schools by publicly expressing and spreading false facts about the president and the principal through an information and communications network for the purpose of openly slandering the quality of the president and the head of the school, through 33 posted on his SNS Penes/Nbrogs, from May 2, 2018 to July 16, 201 (First, this article is published on Pene North, and it is inserted in the same contents in connection with Nene Blobs, and then linked the same contents).

2. Although it is evident that the parties concerned have sufficiently recognized that there was a false representation in the assertion of the facts alleged by the intervenor, such as the responsibility of deceiving a large number of people and inside and outside of the school, and the facts alleged by the intervenor, the “Personnel Gap” cases, etc., such as the expression and dissemination of false facts through the SNS Pestbook North Korea/NAB Blobbs, are as follows and instigates a third party, thereby causing a lot of water inside and outside the school as well as the press, civic groups, community, residents, and educational group, and students in the school as well as the teachers, parents, and students in the school.

3. An teachers' award inappropriate for realizing the founding ideals;

4. A teacher who does not have any figures among those who are repented; and

Ⅱ The State Public Officials Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the teacher of private school who violates the duty to obey Article 57 of the State Public Officials Act.

arrow