logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.08 2014고단3882
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant made a false statement in the “E” of the victim D’s operation in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on August 2009, stating, “F president is required to lend money to F because the president is required to pay KRW 20 million due to the problem of house directors of children,” and if so, he will pay interest of KRW 1 and KRW 5 per month, and the principal will be paid immediately if he talks before two months.”

However, the facts do not lend the above money from the victim, but the defendant borrowed the above money to pay his personal debt. At the time, the defendant's debt amounting to KRW 40 million, and the defendant did not have any specific income, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim.

Around August 25, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 20 million from the victim at a two-dimensional branch of a national bank located in a pair of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, as the borrowed money.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On July 201, 201, the Defendant rendered a false statement to the victim, “I shall pay the Defendant funeral services for five years, if I are in the possession of his/her mother I, and I are in the possession of his/her mother I, and if I are in the possession of his/her own land and do not pay his/her remainder, I shall be able to do so even if I are not able to do so.”

However, at the time, there was a debt amounting to KRW 40 million, and there was no particular property and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt even if it borrowed money from the victim because it borrowed money from others, such as restaurant acceptance fees and repair fees.

around July 28, 2011, the Defendant received KRW 30 million from the victim as the borrowed money from the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. On October 201, 201, the Defendant, at the time of the Defendant’s Hahman’s Hahn and the Defendant’s Hahn from the Defendant’s Hahn and Hahhn, coming to the Defendant’s house.

arrow