logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2020.05.19 2020고단19
사기등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

The defendant shall obtain compensation by deceit from the applicant 70,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On August 2019, the Defendant became aware of the victim C who had been working in a place while performing community service order in D’s patrolmen.

Around September 5, 2019, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant shall repay money to the Defendant within this framework without any turbing from lending money to the Defendant,” at the Victim C’s House located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

However, in fact, the Defendant thought to use the money borrowed from the victim for the purpose of using it for the purpose of using it as the victim’s horse lottery tickets, personal debt repayment, living expenses, etc., and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if she borrowed money from the victim, because the card amount was in excess of credit, such as overdue debts and loan of bonds with no particular property at the time, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay it.

As above, the Defendant, as described in the attached Table 1, including the fact that the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 700,000 from the victim for the same day as the loan money from the victim, and received KRW 3.9 million in total three times from September 5, 2019 to September 10, 2019, by deceiving the victim, and received KRW 3.9 million from the victim.

B. On September 2019, the Defendant came to know of the Victim F, who used the place in H deathna in the Hamba in the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group G, Hamba.

Around October 2, 2019, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would have repaid the money to the victim after the purchase of the money, if he/she borrowed the money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was thought to use the money borrowed from the victim for the rehabilitation of sports earth and sports, repayment of personal debts, living expenses, etc., and given that the card amount was in excess of credit and debt, such as overdue payments and lending of bonds, etc. with no particular property at the time, there was no intent or ability to repay the money even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim.

As above, the defendant belongs to the victim.

arrow