logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.25 2017가단5029388
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. According to the Land Survey Book drawn up with the Japanese colonial rule, the land is deemed to be the land of this case at 383 square meters (hereinafter “instant assessment land”).

)은 경성부 서부 C동(京城府 西部 C洞)에 거주하던 D(D, 이하 위 D를 ‘이 사건 사정명의인’이라고 한다

1) A.I.D. 1913 (2 years by Gohap)

4.5. It shall be written as being examined; and

2) On August 1, 1961, the assessment land of this case is deemed to be the land of this case, E, 1091 square meters and F. F. F. 175 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

) The land of this case was already cadastrally restored. The registration of preservation of ownership in the name of the defendant was made on July 23, 1996 under the receipt of the Goyang Branch Branch Registry of Goyang Branch District Court on July 23, 1996 (hereinafter "registration of preservation of ownership in this case") through the public notice of non-owned real estate on December 10, 193.

(3) The instant land was designated as Grodo H on August 19, 1981, and was changed to Grodo local highway J on March 28, 2005.

나. 원고의 선대와 상속관계 1) K(원고의 아버지)의 조부 L는 M의 차남이자 N의 동생인데, N의 본적은 ‘경성부 O’(京城府 O)였고, L는 N의 호적에 속해 있다가 1918. 8. 2. ‘경성부 P’로 분가하였다. 2) 한편, Q정목은 경성부 구획획정에 따라 1914. 4. 1. 경기도 고시 R로 경성부 서부 중 C동, S동, T동, U동, V동의 각 일부와 W동, X동을 병합하여 부르게 된 지역이다.

3) Lon June 18, 1942, died on June 18, 1942, Y separately succeeded to its Y’s property, Y died on April 20, 1951, and Y separately succeeded to its own property. K died on January 3, 2006, and children of Z, AAB, AC, and AC, including the wife and the Plaintiff, jointly succeeded to its property. [Grounds for Recognition] There is no dispute, and Gap’s 1,2,3,7,14 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

In addition, the fact inquiry results of April 4, 2017 about Gyeonggi-do and the purport of the whole pleadings, as stated in subparagraph 1 of Eul, and the purport of this Court's fact inquiry.

2. The argument and judgment.

arrow