Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 6, 2020, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) on the roads in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B, Yongsan-gu, and (b) on the roads in front of Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and (c) on the roads in front of 23:37, when a woman requests the Defendant to return home to the Defendant under the influence of alcohol, E (32) who is the police officer belonging to the Yongsan Police Station D (32) called the Yongsan Police Station D, which was called after being reported 112.

whether or not.

The bit of bit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a son,

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. When the Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act is arrested as a flagrant offender interfering with the performance of official duties at a time, place under paragraph (1), and is brought in to the D District District located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, he takes a bath under the influence of alcohol, spits or spits on the floor, spits or brushes on the floor, and brushes down in a bank;

In other words, he was unable to avoid disturbance over about 30 minutes, such as London.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to very rough words and actions by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the Defendant’s legal statement G written investigation report (related to additional crimes committed by the person suspected of committing the crime) to the Defendant’s statement E, to the effect that the Defendant’s criminal investigation report (to listen to the victim’s video statement in the DNA security guards), to the closure photographs of the articles that the Defendant faced with the police officer, to investigation report (to listen to the victim’s video statement in the DNA security guards), and to the head of the

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing the revocation of official duties), and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime is not good, since a police officer, who was in the course of performing official duties for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, committed an act of disturbance even after being taken into custody in the earth, and committed an act of disturbance.