A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 22:30 on November 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to pay taxi charges from the Seoul Yongsan Police Station traffic and the Gyeongju D, a victim who was requested to drive a taxi driver who did not pay a taxi fee and did so under the influence of alcohol on the road in front of the 200 Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul; and (b) expressed a desire to pay the victim the taxi charges to the victim, who was in receipt of C’s request to pay the taxi charges; and (c) expressed a desire to “the Mo fuu”, “the Chewing ki,” and “the Chewing ki.” while being kept by the aforementioned C and the jus, and assaulted the victim, such as walking the bridge of the police box F of the Seoul Yongsan Police Station belonging to the Seoul Yongsan Police Station, which was dispatched after the 112 report.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim D, and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

[2015 Highest 774] Defendant 2, 23:30 on February 2, 2015, affixed the following seals.

2. 3. From 00:30 to 00:30, at the first convenience store operated by the victim H in the Gyeonggi-gu G, female employees who entered a drunk while under the influence of alcohol and worked in the said place, “a telephone number is changed, Mana” is considered to be “Mana”, the customer is unable to calculate, and the said convenience store is continued to return to the said convenience store.

Therefore, the victim refused to demand that the defendant be sent to the defendant, resulting in the appearance of the victim, and the victim was sixth, and the police officer, upon receiving the victim's report, sent out of the above convenience store, took the disturbance, such as moving the victim out of the above convenience store, making the victim unsatisfy, and making the customers entering the above convenience store unsatisfying the objects, and preventing them from entering.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store business by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highest 3580"

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to F, C, and D 1.