logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.05.20 2013고단6249
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 26, 2007, the Defendant is a person who has been sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Gwangju District Court for eight months or more; a person who, in the same court on September 16, 2013, received a summary order of a fine of six million won or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license); and on September 17, 2013, the same court issued a summary order of five million won or more to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and received a summary order of five million won or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On November 28, 2013, at around 01:35, the Defendant driven a car with a gallon in a state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.175% without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 400 meters in the section of approximately 400 meters from the south-gu Seoul metropolitan city to the E Hospital History in the south-gu, Gwangju metropolitan city.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaged in driving a gallon car.

On November 28, 2013, at around 01:35, the Defendant driven the said vehicle while drunk without obtaining a driver’s license, and led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle along the four-lane road near the remote distance of the E Hospital located in Gwangju Southern-gu along the Korean funeral hall.

Since there is a signal, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely according to good faith.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the breakdown of the Gi30 vehicle driving by the victim F(the age of 31) who was driven by the victim F(the age of 31) under the new subparagraph on the opposite lane due to the negligence of left-hand turn, even though the vehicle driving signal is a straight signal, to the front part of the vehicle of the defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim F by negligence in the course of business, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow