A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On July 15, 2015, at around 13:00, the Defendant reported 112 to the effect that “the worker was assaulted by a son” at the C bicycle race located in the Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant arrested him as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of assault as referred to in paragraph (1) from E in the circumstances belonging to the D District Unit of the Siung Police Station, which was called out at the same time, and used the said E at the same time during the patrol-lane, the Defendant expressed his desire to read “the gate ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The area of mitigation (in the event of obstruction of performance of official duties/performance of official duties) [decision of sentence] of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Korea (decision of sentence] of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Korea is not easy, and the case of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Korea is two times, and there are two criminal records related to violence of the defendant, the defendant reflects the mistake of the police officer, the violence used by the police officer was not serious, the same crime was punished by a fine, and all the other factors of sentencing specified in the arguments of the case are considered.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. Around 13:00 on July 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) stated that “A victim, who was solicited to return home from the Victim F (the age of 45) who is the manager of the above bicycle race track, was urged to return home from a disturbance, such as a frighting a horse in the state of drinking at the cke line B located in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si, the Defendant used the victim’s chest by her hand the victim’s chest by her hand, “A flobb kb w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w

2. Determination of applicable provisions of Acts: Crimes of no punishment by intention under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act; and