A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:35 on June 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a report in front of C on the road in front of C when the game was conducted, and reported to the 112th day, stating, “I am an animal by cutting the hip in a hack pipe; booming the disturbance;” and (c) am a trial expense without any justifiable reason to the above E while having heard the circumstances about the reported case from the police officers belonging to the D District Unit of the Gyeonggi City Police Station D District, which called “I am an hacks immediately, and the level of the Sihion Police hacking hack hack hack hack h h h h h h h h h h h k h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Ministry of Home Affairs concerning internal investigation reports, on-site and victim photographs, copies of work logs, public officials' certificates, and 112 reported cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 186(1) of the same Act / [amended by Act No. 1548, Dec. 1, 2007) for the following reasons: The following factors are taken into account: (a) the reason for sentencing of Article 186(1) of the same Act (amended by Act No. 1548, Feb. 1, 200; (b) the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (amended by Act No. 1054, Jun. 1, 200) (amended by Act No. 1004