logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.07.24 2014나2042262
용역비
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into a service contract with B with the following content:

(1) In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff did not intend to make a contract for the establishment of the E-Gun Urban Planning Information System (UPS), and the Defendant did not intend to make a contract for the establishment of the contract for the establishment of the contract for the establishment of the E-Gun Urban Planning Information System (UPS), and the contract for the establishment of the contract period from March 10, 201 to November 15, 2010 (hereinafter “First contract for the E-Gun Project”).

(2) On June 15, 2010, with respect to the construction of the G-Gun Urban Planning Information System and the third source spatial data utilization system on August 30, 2010, with respect to the contract amount of KRW 82,280,000 with respect to the project management portion from April 23, 2010 to April 22, 2011 (hereinafter “third service contract”) and the contract amount of KRW 53,317,000 with respect to the construction of the G-Gun Urban Planning Information System and the third source spatial data utilization system (hereinafter “third service contract”) from May 11, 2010 to February 11, 2011.

(4) On August 30, 2010, a service contract for the construction of the I City Urban Planning Information System DB from August 16, 2011 to August 26, 2012 with regard to the contract amount of KRW 23,760,00 with respect to the land suitability assessment among urban/Gun management planning (natural Environment Conservation Area) renewal services (hereinafter “V service contract”) from August 13, 201, to August 16, 201 (hereinafter “V service contract”).

A person shall be appointed.

B. According to the first service contract, the Plaintiff completed the service by November 15, 201, and issued an electronic tax invoice for KRW 60,000,000 for progress payment on November 23, 2010, and KRW 60,000 for completion payment on March 10, 201, but did not receive KRW 60,00,000 for the first service contract.

arrow