logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.10 2013가합553397
용역비
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s rehabilitation claim against B is KRW 118,61,021 and KRW 100,025,60 among them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The service contract was concluded with B as follows:

(1) With respect to the construction of the E-Gun urban planning information system on April 22, 2010, the contract amount of KRW 120,00,000, and the contract period from March 10, 2010 to November 15, 2010, ② the contract amount of KRW 82,280,000, and the project management among the construction of the F-Gun urban planning information system on June 15, 2010, the contract period of KRW 20,70,000, from April 23, 2010 to April 22, 201, and KRW 16,00,000, from KRW 20,000, and KRW 20,000,000 to KRW 36,00,00,000; and ④ the contract period of the urban planning service contract from KRW 31,70,01,01; and

(i) Under the service contract, the Plaintiff completed the service by November 15, 201, and issued an electronic tax invoice for KRW 60,000,000 for progress payment on November 23, 2010, and KRW 60,000 for completion payment on March 10, 201, but did not receive KRW 60,00,000 out of the 1 service contract.

The Plaintiff completed the service by April 22, 201, and issued an electronic tax invoice for KRW 41,410,000 for progress payment on July 1, 2010, and KRW 40,870,00 for completion payment on May 23, 2011, but did not receive KRW 40,025,60 (part of the completion payment) out of the two service charges.

Article 38(1) of the Act on the Protection and Improvement of Family Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Protection and Improvement of Family Affairs")

arrow