logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.05.29 2014고단1418
공문서변조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person working as a staff member of the Quality Management Division of the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Co., Ltd.

D is a subordinate supplier of the E company that procure munitions to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, and the above D supplied 10 supply (market price equivalent to 42,280 won) of “domination”, which is the accessories of the 10 tons of military vehicles, which are munitions, to the E company. As the Defendant failed to secure the test results due to the imminent delivery period of the above parts, he had the intent to modify the original contents of the test results and submit them.

2. On October 2010, the Defendant changed the official document at the office of the above D Quality Control Division, using the computer “forest board” program, and entered “F”, “F, 03, 09, 240 hours”, “72 hours, and 240 hours” in the column of the test result under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration of Daegu-do, Daegu-do, which was normally issued, in the column of “documents number”, “F,” “FZn8-D”, and “the issuance date column” respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant altered one copy of the results of the investigation under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in Daegu-do, Daegu-do.

3. On October 2012, the Defendant exercised an altered official document by sending one copy of the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration in the name of the Daegu-do Small and Medium Business Administration, which altered as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, to G employees of the E Quality Management Division, at the office of the said D Quality Management Division, who was aware of the alteration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the prosecutor's statement concerning H (including the I's statement part);

1. A written accusation;

1. Results of a false or forged test;

1. A reply to a request for cooperation to verify the authenticity of an official report by an authorized testing institution;

1. Application of a part of the Acts and subordinate statutes, such as munitions photographs;

1. Relevant Article 225 of the Criminal Act and Article 229 and Article 229 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow