A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents and display of private documents on January 25, 2014;

A. On January 25, 2014, around 23:25, the Defendant forged a private document and arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender by assaulting C with the Defendant’s house located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan. On the same day, around 23:50 on the same day, the Defendant attempted to gather a pro-friendly F’s personal information while preparing a written confirmation of arrest of a flagrant offender in E district located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan.

On January 25, 2014, the Defendant confirmed that “F”: F, resident registration number: G (50 years of age); G (50); and (23:25 on January 25, 2014, the Defendant was arrested in flagrant offender B in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and that he was given a defense counsel with the summary of the suspected crime, the reason for arrest, and the reason for arrest, and the opportunity for defense upon receipt of notice that he/she may request a review of the legality of arrest. On January 25, 2014, the Defendant signed “F” on the confirmation column of the confirmation certificate of the arrest of flagrant offender and marked his/her name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a certificate of arrest of a flagrant offender in F name, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact.

B. On January 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) issued a false flagrant offender arrest certificate to the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the E Zone, who was aware of the forgery in the E Zone; and (b) exercised the same as the document duly formed.

2. On January 26, 2014, around 01:15, the Defendant: (a) received an investigation from a criminal department and office of the Busan Police Station located in Busan Jin-dong, Busan, and (b) with respect to the assault case with respect to C, the Defendant was willing to gather a pro-friendly F’s personal information.

For the purpose of exercising authority, without authority, the defendant committed as the above F, and let the above I enter the above F personal information in the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant, and "F" in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol.