logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2019. 05. 29. 선고 2018누2204 판결
법인세법 시행규칙 제46조의2 제1항 제5호에서 ‘건설에 착공’하였다는 문언의 의미는, ‘건축물’의 건설에 착공한 경우를 말하는 것임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Jeonju District Court-2018-Guhap-194 ( October 11, 2018)

Title

The meaning of "construction commencement" in Article 46-2 (1) 5 of the Enforcement Rule of the Corporate Tax Act refers to the case where construction of "building" starts.

Summary

The meaning of the phrase "construction commencement" in Article 46-2 (1) 5 of the Enforcement Rule of the Corporate Tax Act means the case where construction of "building" commences, considering that the provision of this case is limited to the case where construction commences after acquiring "land on which no building is established".

Related statutes

Article 55-2 of the Corporate Tax Act

Cases

2018Nu2204 Revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax Imposition

Plaintiff

AA

Defendant

00. Head of tax office

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 24, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

May 29, 2019

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The corporate tax of the Defendant for the business year of 000,000 against the Plaintiff on October 000

The imposition of KRW 000 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance, except that “the division of 000.00.000.00.00.00.00.00.00.....00....00.....00” is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, thereby citing the judgment of the first instance pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow