The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous in the misapprehension of the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty, even though the victims were not sealed as stated in the facts charged, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below and the court below acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the victims have consistently made a statement on the main part that “G had affixed the video image on a mobile phone, and the defendant got off the cell phone and pushed down the victims later,” ② the defendants, E, and the victims at the time were in fighting and physical fighting due to the divorce issue, ③ the victims were in the face of the horse fighting and physical fighting, ③ the victims were in the face of the victim’s speech, and the voice that the victims come out in the direction of the victims. G was in the victim’s speech, and G was in the victim’s cell phone, and G was made a statement that the victims got out of the victim’s cell phone and got out of the victim’s cell phone, ④ The victim’s witness at the court below also stated that the victim E was in the form of the victim’s arm’s length and the victim’s body was in excess of the victim’s body and there was no reason to acknowledge that the defendant stated.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.