Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:20 on March 20, 2013, the Defendant was seated 20 times in order to take onto the express bus of Suwon-gu, Gwangju-si. However, according to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, D is found to have been seated 16 at the time when the Defendant was seated (17 seat after the Defendant was seated) on the bus and corrected ex officio.

Before the seat E (W, 22) and 9 (W, 30 years old) of the seat, the two arms have been laid out, and the sexual flag has been laid out of the seat, and the seat was openly obscene.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements made by witnesses D and E in the fourth trial records;

1. Partial statement of the defendant on the 10th trial date;

1. Application of the prosecution examination protocol to the accused;

1. Relevant Article 245 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 245 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The judgment of the Defendant and the defense counsel on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order was made by the Defendant on the bus immediately before the bus gets on the bus, and her clothes were put in the toilet bomer, and the bus was rapidly cut on the bus, and thus, the Defendant was exposed to the Defendant’s sexual organ even if it was not set up.

This argues to the effect that it is an negligent act.

In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, i.e., ① the witness D and E, the defendant was seated in the bus because of the same agreement, and again boarded the bus again, and the defendant was asked at the time of first leaving the bus at the time of first leaving the bus, and the defendant was aware that he was not able to raise a boom at the time of second leaving the bus, and as alleged by the defendant, the defendant was also aware that he was not able to do so at the first place on the bus, then he saw the bus at the time of the first place, or she again laid down the bus immediately before leaving the bus.