A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court, and on March 16, 2009, issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

1. On July 21, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Dless driving) on the road: (a) on July 21, 2016, without obtaining a motor device license from the front of the Defendant’s home located in Sung-gu, Changwon-si D from around 300 meters to the front road located in Changsi-si, Changsi-si; and (b) on the part of about 0.157% of alcohol concentration in blood, the Defendant driven F U.S. Ra under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a person who is the holder of Furine.

The Defendant operated the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the entry in paragraph 1.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a F U.S. On the part of the Defendant.

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant driven the upper 08:08 on the upper oba, and driven the upper oba, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.157% in blood, led to the front fababababa, which is located in the Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-si D, Changwon-si, to the ethababababast from the side of

Since there are many parking vehicles on both sides of a road because housing, commercial buildings, etc. are adjacent to each other, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take care of the accident by accurately manipulating the steering left and left well, and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as above, was negligent in neglecting the front-time city and proceeded with the part of the driving seat of the Defendant G G, which was parked at the right edge of the driving direction of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above work performance.