A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law at the Suwon Friwon, etc., and the term of imprisonment was terminated on December 23, 2016 when the sentence was executed.

[2] On November 30, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon Franchising Board, and on July 4, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On November 14, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act by the same court on November 14, 2008. On June 11, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act by a fine of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On January 21, 2016, the same court was sentenced to imprisonment of KRW 1 year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

"2017 Highest 6006"

1. On August 9, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving alcohol) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) stated in the indictment around around 02:02 on August 9, 2017, the time of the crime is “02:42 around 02:00, which is the time of the measurement of drinking.” However, the indictment is recognized as being “02:02 around 02, which is the time of report.”

DBEAVER AF under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.205% in blood without obtaining a motor device bicycle license from the front road of Suwon-si, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si to the 45-way road, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 13-ro, 45-ro.

As a result, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice, and drives a motor bicycle without obtaining a motor device bicycle license under the influence of alcohol again.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is the owner of DBAV AV AER.

The defendant operated the above Oral Ba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.