logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.09.18 2018고단764
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On December 22, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 100,000,000 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on December 22, 2008, and on May 2, 2016, a summary order of KRW 5,00,000 as a fine for the same crime at the same court.

On April 9, 2018, at around 03:10, the Defendant driven a vehicle with a alcohol level of 0.088% under the influence of alcohol level 0.08% from the 14km section from the road near the residence of the Defendant in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si, Sungwon-si to the road adjacent to the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, without a driver’s license.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a car in C S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-P.

On April 9, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, as set forth in paragraph 1 of around 03:10, and driven it along the three-lane distance from the right side of the one-day signal crossing to the two sub-sections for interesting life, which is in the two moralitys of the members of Changwon-si, Changwon-si.

At night, since the driver was at night, he had a duty of care to safely operate the steering boat and the steering system by accurately operating the steering boat and the steering system.

Nevertheless, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving and was parked at the right edge of the Defendant’s proceeding, and the part of the Defendant’s E.S. E. Sheet, which was parked at the right edge of the Defendant’s proceeding, was shocked by the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures while destroying the victim’s vehicle by occupational negligence as above.

arrow