logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.10.04 2013고정2862
무고
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years to imprisonment with prison labor for robbery, etc. at the Busan District Court on January 10, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 29, 2012.

On October 9, 2012, the defendant prepared a false complaint with respect to the defendant C using a computer in the office of the Busan District Court in front of the Busan District Court of the Busan District Court, and at the Busan Jin Police Station on the same day, the defendant made a statement to the defendant D on the basis of the above complaint.

Around January 3, 2011, the main contents of the complaint and its statement are as follows: “The fact to be exercised by the Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s 2nd floor E is stated in the name column of the applicant’s personal card membership application form “A”, “G” and “Y 2-101,” and in the address column, “A” and one copy of the application form for personal card membership with Defendant’s signature affixed to the Defendant’s name and affixed the Defendant’s signature to the Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s 2nd floor from February 28, 2011 to July 7, 2011, and thus, the Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s 6,694,832 won credit card was also punished.”

However, on January 3, 2011, the defendant consented to the application for the issuance of a credit card to the defendant in a de facto marital relationship, and around that time, I gave consent to the issuance of a new family card issued before the defendant's mobile phone, and there was no fact that the defendant was forged, exercising the right of the defendant, and obtained it by fraud, such as impairing the consent to the issuance of a new family card again to the new card call center counselor around January 5, 201.

Nevertheless, on October 9, 2012, the defendant is a police official who is unable to know his name at the Busan Jin-gu public service center of the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, the 111-gil.

arrow