logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.01.05 2016고단1586
사문서위조등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant purchased under the name of his spouse C and operated by the defendant.

DSM7 Automobiles kept in custody of the defendant's office to sell the cars

The C's seal impression also used the C's seal imprint certificate to forge the C's car transfer certificate.

On June 3, 2015, the Defendant printed out “C” and “C” in the name column of the transferor in the form of a motor vehicle transfer certificate using a computer at a Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongbuk-do, and 110 Dong-dong 804, Cheongbuk-do,” and affixed the seal imprint of C at Defendant’s home to the name side of the said document, and then delivered it to FF employees as if the document was duly formed.

For the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged and exercised one copy of a motor vehicle transfer certificate in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against C;

1. A copy of registration certificate;

1. Application of the statutes on a copy of a forged motor vehicle transfer certificate;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the period computed by converting the amount of KRW 100,000 into one day) by the detention in a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the grounds that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (in fact, the circumstances leading to the instant crime in the process of disposing of vehicles owned by the Defendant, but in the name of his spouse, the circumstances leading to the Defendant’s mistake, and the fact that the Defendant repented his mistake

arrow