logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.03.24 2016고정104
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A crime on September 3, 2009;

A. On September 3, 2009, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim D’s personal information in the applicant column, such as entering the applicant column “D” and the resident registration number column “E” in the cell phone agency located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, with a black pen on the application form for opening the cell phone; and (b) signed D arbitrarily on the name side of the application form.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the written application for opening the cell phone (F) in the name of private document D, which is a private document on proof of facts.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as above A, submitted a forged mobile phone opening statement to an employee of the mobile phone agency who is not aware of the forgery, and exercised it as if the document was duly formed.

(c)

The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act by filing an application for opening a cell phone in the name of the victim without the victim's permission at the same time and at the same place as the above A, and submitting a copy of the victim's resident registration certificate to an employee of the mobile phone agency with which the victim's name is unknown.

2. A crime committed on January 26, 201;

A. On January 26, 2011, the Defendant forged a private document with the victim D’s personal information on the applicant column, such as making an interview with a tample on the application form for mobile phone number transfer at the “H” mobile phone agency located in Ulsan-gu G, Ulsan-gu, and making an entry into the applicant column “D” and the resident registration number column “E”, and then arbitrarily signing D’s signature on the name next to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application form for mobile phone number transfer (F) in the name of private document D, which is a private document to prove facts.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above A, has completed the application for mobile phone number transfer as above, to a mobile phone agency employee who is unable to know the name of the forgery.

arrow