logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.19 2015가단28194
건물명도등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a)delivery of Daejeon-dong-gu C No. 503, Daejeon-gu;

B. From May 7, 2015, the above real estate.

Reasons

1. On March 7, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant and Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, providing for the lease deposit of KRW 2 million, monthly rent of KRW 400,000,000, and the term of lease from March 7, 2015 to March 7, 2016 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

Since the Defendant is in arrears with the payment of the rent from May 7, 2015, the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease contract on the ground that the rent is overdue.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and pay unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent and rent.

2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act:

arrow