1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Plaintiff

The main point of the argument is that the plaintiff suffered dental treatment in B dental surgery operated by the defendant from October 17, 2015 to March 4, 2016 due to the pain and fluoral symptoms of the right upper and lower level, and the defendant diagnosed the plaintiff's symptoms as 147 pacta (Thoe No. 2 Daegu) pacta, and limited to Ma47 dental treatment.

However, on April 2, 2016, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from another hospital on April 2, 2016, resulting in a strike of Ma16 U.S. (T. 1 Daegu).

After all, the defendant damaged the plaintiff's normal Ma47-pathal due to diagnosis and treatment, deprived of the plaintiff's opportunity to receive medical treatment of Ma16-pathal, resulting in the strike of Ma16-pathal. The defendant is obliged to pay to the plaintiff the expenses for medical treatment and future treatment costs of 5,680,000 won, consolation money of 2,680,000 won, and delay damages.

Judgment

It is not sufficient to recognize that the defendant provided unnecessary treatment to the 15th or 16th or 16th or 15th or 3th or 3th or 3th or 47th or 6th or 6th or 16th or 6th or 6th or 6th or 6th or 6th or 6th or 6th or 6th or 6th or 6th or 1

Therefore, the prior plaintiff's claim cannot be accepted without further review, on different premise.

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.