logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.08 2017고단8163
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, for two years, for two years, and for ten months, for Defendant D, respectively.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant D] 2017 Highest 7854

1. The defendant is the defendant's representative director E who engages in the business of leasing sound equipment, etc. B is the representative of F, a corporation located in Pyeongtaek-gun, which aims at cultural and art-related business, and A is the head of F, an incorporated association, who takes charge of the fund execution business of the above corporation.

2. As seen in the part of not guilty under the fraud, the facts charged were corrected appropriately to the extent that Defendant B did not infringe Defendant D’s right of defense.

Gyeonggi-do shall support “H” projects (hereinafter “instant projects”) with contents of music performance in G areas to restore the sports ties of G due to so-called “Messsure” and to encourage residents, and shall provide 240,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, of the Do subsidy around July 29, 2015. On August 10, 2015, G City entrusted the instant projects to I, a foundation for victims (hereinafter “victim I”), around August 21, 2015.

The Defendant: (a) was selected as a proxy agent of the instant project by the victim I; and (b) received the money in the name of the grant from the victim I, paid the money in excess of the actual amount required for the instant project, based on the false contract and estimate entered in the performance service provider, equipment rental service provider, etc.; (c) subsequently, the Defendant: (a) paid the money in excess of the amount required for the instant project; and (d) provided the victim I with false settlement data; and (b) provided the victim I with the intent to keep the right to claim return; and (c) the Defendant conspiredd with each other to take charge of the role of collecting and returning the excessive amount paid by the equipment rental service provider, etc.

After that, the defendant et al. is under the JJ on August 25, 2015.

arrow