logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.15 2014고단2755
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. The victim’s “ Incorporated Association D” of the victim’s “ Incorporated Association D” was established for the purpose of improving the citizens’ awareness for establishing the identity of the Republic of Korea around May 2005.

The Defendant, from August 2005 to December 2012, 2012, has been engaged in the operation and fund management of the said corporation as a director of the “ Incorporated Association D” as the victim of the Songpa-gu Seoul building 301.

The defendant received goods necessary for the operation of the above corporation and paid goods arbitrarily, and received some of them from his account to return them to his account and received them for personal use.

Around July 14, 2009, the Defendant received advertising materials, etc. for KRW 1,513,000 from H operating the printing business under the trade name “G” in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on behalf of the victim, but paid KRW 3,193,00 from the bank account (I) in the name of H in the name of the goods price, and then voluntarily consumed KRW 680,000 among them for personal use after having returned KRW 1,680,00 from H to the Defendant’s national bank account (J) and then embezzled KRW 680,00 from that time to August 11, 2010.

B. The victim’s “K Association” of the victim’s occupational embezzlement was established for the purpose of improving the status of disabled entrepreneurs and protecting their rights and interests around 2006.

The Defendant, from April 2010 to December 2013, 2013, has been engaged in the operation and fund management of the Association as the two chairpersons of the Songpa-gu Seoul Association Seoul Association, the victim of the building E (hereinafter “K Association Seoul Association”).

The defendant paid excessive benefits to the Seoul Branch staff at will, or voluntarily receive the difference corresponding to the difference, from the retired staff.

arrow