logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.03 2016누57610
공장신설(변경)승인신청 불가처분 취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The grounds for the plaintiff's assertion in the trial while filing an appeal do not differ from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first trial, and even if each evidence submitted in the first trial and the trial together with the plaintiff's assertion, the judgment of the first instance that dismissed the plaintiff's claim is justified.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The addition or dismissal shall be made by adding "A according to each entry in Section 33-1 to Section 3," which shall be the 19th 10th 19th 10th 19th 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The term "30 years" in the 19th sentence of the first instance court shall be read as "24 to 32 years".

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow