logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.01 2016누66645
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The grounds cited in the judgment of the court of first instance, which the Plaintiff asserted in the trial while filing an appeal, are as follows: “The Plaintiff’s father appointed the Plaintiff by will as the inheritor in the short place of duty, and the Plaintiff’s large lusium and double lusium, i.e., the Plaintiff’s lusium and double lusium, as the Plaintiff’s father was appointed as the inheritor in the short place of duty, desire to take the Plaintiff’s legacy and take the Plaintiff’

In full view of the evidence presented in the first instance trial and the purport of the entire argument, even if the Plaintiff, as alleged by the Plaintiff, succeeded to the status of the father’s shortage, the threat of the Plaintiff’s assertion is merely a dispute between families rather than a “feasible on the ground of the status of a member of a specific social group,” and thus, the first instance judgment rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition or dismissal as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition or dismissal, the following shall be added to the second 8th of the first instance judgment:

The plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on November 16, 2015, but the above objection was dismissed on the same ground as March 24, 2016." The second half of the judgment of the first instance court of "the second half of the judgment of the first instance is "the second half of the final position" and "the second half of the judgment of the first instance is "the second half of the final position".

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow