1. The Plaintiff:

가. 피고 B은 별지 목록 제1항 기재 부동산 1층 중 별지 도면 표시 ⓐ, ⓑ, ⓒ, ⓖ,...

1. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim

A. (1) The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction project association approved by the head of Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents on September 4, 2008 (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

(2) On June 21, 2013, the Plaintiff obtained authorization from the head of Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the head of Jung-gu, Seoul, the head of the Gu for project implementation whose enforcement area covers H 68,255.8 square meters, and obtained authorization for the management and disposition plan on January 22, 2015, and was publicly notified.

(서울특별시 중랑구 고시 I). (3) 별지 목록 기재 각 부동산은 위 사업시행구역 내에 위치하고 있는데, 피고 B은 별지 목록 제1항 기재 부동산 1층 중 별지 도면 표시 ⓐ, ⓑ, ⓒ, ⓖ, ⓐ를 순차로 연결한 선내 (가) 부분 45.785㎡의, 피고 C은 별지 목록 제1항 기재 부동산 중 2층 107.75㎡의, 피고 D은 별지 목록 제1항 기재 부동산 중 3층 44.575㎡의, 피고 E은 별지 목록 제2항 기재 부동산 중 지층 B102호 33.115㎡의, 피고 F은 별지 목록 제2항 기재 부동산 중 2층 55.62㎡의 각 임차인으로서, 현재 위 각 부분을 점유하고 있다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants whose use or profit-making has been suspended as a lessee according to the above management and disposal plan approval and public notice are obligated to deliver the pertinent building portion possessed by the Defendants to the Plaintiff, who lawfully acquired the right to use or profit-making from each of the above buildings as a project implementer, unless there

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Da62561, Jul. 24, 2014). 2. Determination as to Defendant B and C’s assertion

A. As to the assertion, Defendant B and C asserts to the following purport:

Although the purport of Defendant B’s assertion is somewhat unclear, it may be detrimental to the purport of demanding compensation as stated in the above paragraphs (a), (b), and (c).