beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
The evidence of Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office 2014Mo3655, which was seized.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 7323]
1. At around 03:00 on September 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) accessed the victim G who was under influence of alcohol in front of the F Building in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) taken off one resident registration certificate from the back of the victim’s lower part; (c) taken off one part of the victim’s wall consisting of one resident registration certificate, one national bank physical card, and one community credit cooperative physical card; and (d) stolen property worth KRW 603,000,000 in total five times from that time until September 26, 2014, as indicated in the list of crimes.
2. On July 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00, among the mid-term 14:00, obtained a copy of a victim E-owned self-member card, which was far away from the bottom of the I theater located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
[2014 Highest 7679]
3. At around 04:00 on September 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) accessed the victim K, who was under the influence of alcohol from the underpass stairs in front of the J building in Seoul, Jung-gu; (b) then was cut off with one debit card, one cti bank cash card, one cti bank credit card, one agricultural bank credit card, one cti bank credit card, one cti bank debit card, and one driver’s license.
4. The Defendant in violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, around 04:51 on September 1, 2014, paying subway charges in the subway station located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 405, along with the payment of subway fares, used a stolen debit card by accessing the subway fares to the device of subway fares as if the Defendant was a legitimate licensee, as shown in paragraph (3). The Defendant also used a stolen debit card from around that time to September 08:27, 2014, 5 times from that time.